Grant Matching
Civly Nonprofits

Find the funders already paying for work like yours.

Every private foundation and every grantmaking charity reports the checks it wrote — the organization that got the money, the amount, and the purpose in the funder’s own words — in a public IRS filing. Civly holds millions of those grants and matches your organization against them, so you approach the funders whose money already reaches your cause, your state, and your size.

A priorities page is marketing. The 990 is the receipt.

Most grant tools sell a directory: open calls, deadlines, and each funder’s own description of what it cares about. That is what a foundation says. Its tax return is what it did — every grant paid, the recipient named, the dollar figure, and the purpose written by the funder, filed under penalty of perjury. Ten years of a funder’s checks predict the eleventh better than any mission statement.

What they fund, in their words

Every grant carries a purpose line the funder wrote — “community health worker training,” “emergency shelter operations,” “after-school literacy.” We match your programs against that text across millions of paid grants, not against a category dropdown that flattens your work into “Human Services.”

Who they actually fund

Recipient name, address, and EIN sit on the grant record. So we can see what a funder does rather than what it claims: whether it gives outside its own county, whether it writes $10,000 checks or $500,000 checks, and whether the organizations it backs look anything like yours.

Whether you can realistically get in

Closed foundations look closed in the data. The same handful of recipients year after year, and a filing that names any relationship between a grantee and a foundation manager. Those rank last, so your list is funders with a demonstrated habit of backing organizations they were not already connected to.

What a match looks like

Every row carries the evidence that produced it: the grant, the year, the funder’s own purpose language, and the filing it came from.

Civly Grant MatchRiverside Community Health Alliance Illustrative example
01
Cedar Ridge Family FoundationPrivate foundation · Columbus, OH
$1.24M9 peer organizations · 2019–2024
Paid “training and salary support for community health workers serving uninsured adults” — $180,000 to a peer organization, FY2024990-PF Part XV
Decision-makers on the filing: 4 trustees, two of whom also sit on an Ohio hospital board
02
Weatherfield FoundationPrivate foundation · Chicago, IL · gives in 11 states
$2.10M14 peer organizations · 2020–2024
Paid “primary care access for uninsured adults” — $250,000, FY2024. Three of its grantees are your size and outside Illinois990-PF Part XV
Decision-makers on the filing: 7 officers and directors
03
Franklin County Community FoundationPublic charity · Columbus, OH
$860K6 peer organizations · 2021–2024
Paid “mobile clinic operations, medically underserved census tracts” — $125,000, FY2023, and again in FY2024990 Schedule I
Decision-makers on the filing: 11 officers, directors and key employees
04
The Halloran TrustPrivate foundation · Cincinnati, OH
$540K5 peer organizations · 2019–2023
Paid “health navigation for immigrant and refugee families” — $75,000, FY2023. Adjacent, not identical — ranked here for that reason990-PF Part XV
Decision-makers on the filing: 3 trustees
Names and figures on this sheet are illustrative. In a live match every funder, amount, purpose line and person resolves to a specific filing you can open yourself.

How the Match Works

Three passes: read your organization out of its own filings, find the funders whose money moves toward that work, then name the people who decide.

Read your organization

  1. Anchor on your EIN — your own returns carry your purpose, your program descriptions, your revenue and your geography. No questionnaire to fill in first.
  2. Use your program language, not a category — the plain-English description of what you actually do is a far better matching key than an NTEE code shared by 40,000 organizations.
  3. Treat your current funders as the strongest signal — who already gives to you describes who else might, better than anything you could write about yourself.
  4. Set the ask band — grants near a size you can absorb and report on, so the list is not topped by a $5M outlier you will never win.

Find the funders

  1. Search purpose text across millions of paid grants — by meaning rather than keyword, so “community health worker” still finds a funder who wrote “lay health navigator.”
  2. Screen for reachability — does this funder give beyond its home city, beyond its founding family, at your size, to organizations it had no prior tie to?
  3. Rank on recency and repetition — a funder that gave three years running is a live prospect. One that gave once, in 2016, is a history lesson.
  4. Remove what you already have — your existing funders come out, so the list is only new ground.

Name the people

  1. Pull officers and directors from the same filings — the trustees and staff who actually approve grants, with their titles.
  2. Verify reachability — email and phone run through the same layered verification pipeline behind Civly’s contact data.
  3. Find the overlap — board members you share, or who serve alongside someone already on your board. A warm path beats a cold letter.
  4. Attach the evidence — every name arrives with the grant that put the funder on your list in the first place.

It arrives as an email, not another login.

A grant match is not a dashboard you have to remember to open. Civly re-runs the match as new filings land and sends a brief: what is new since last time, what changed at funders you were already working, and who to talk to. Reply to it to ask for more on any single funder.

Grant Match — 4 new funders, 1 change Civly <[email protected]> · to Development, Riverside Community Health Alliance

Four funders newly match your programs, and one you were already tracking changed its giving.

  • Cedar Ridge Family Foundation — $180,000 for community health worker salaries, FY2024. First time this fund has appeared in your match. 4 trustees named · filing attached
  • Weatherfield Foundation — gave outside Illinois in three of the last four years. 7 officers named · filing attached
  • The Halloran Trust — adjacent purpose language, smaller checks. Ranked 4th, included so you can judge it yourself. 3 trustees named
  • Franklin County Community Foundation — repeat grant to a peer, FY2023 and FY2024. 11 officers named

Changed: a funder on your list has not reported a grant in your program area for two consecutive filings. Worth a call before another proposal cycle.

What the Match Runs On

Public filings, at scale. Nothing here requires a funder to have told anyone what it plans to do next.

Foundation giving

  1. Private-foundation grants (990-PF, Part XV) — millions of grants: recipient name, address and EIN, the amount, the purpose in the foundation’s words, and any stated relationship between grantee and foundation manager.
  2. Charity-to-charity grants (990, Schedule I) — what community foundations, United Ways, hospital systems and large charities pay out to other organizations.
  3. Foundation contributors (990-PF, Schedule B) — the named donors funding a private foundation, which is often how you learn who is really behind it.

The people

  1. Officers, directors and trustees (990, Part VII) — tens of millions of records: who runs the funder, their title, and how long they have been there.
  2. Key-employee compensation (Schedule J) — useful for reading how professionalized a funder is, and whether there is program staff to talk to at all.
  3. Contact verification — email and phone confirmed through Civly’s verification pipeline before a name reaches your team.

Government and your own record

  1. Federal grants and grantees — federal award records plus the SAM.gov registry, so you can see which peers hold federal money and for what.
  2. State procurement — contracts and grants in California, New York and Texas.
  3. Your filings — your purpose, programs, revenue, geography and existing funders, read straight out of your returns.

What this is not. Civly indexes grants that were paid, not opportunities that are open. There is no RFP calendar here and no deadline feed, and we do not write or submit your application. A 990 also arrives months after the year it covers, so the newest filings describe last year’s giving.

What that record buys you is direction that a directory cannot: which funders actually move money toward work like yours, at what size, how often, and which human being to call. Every claim on your match sheet resolves to a filing you can open and read yourself.

Works with the rest of Civly

Grant Matching finds the money. These decide what you do about it.

Donor Due Diligence →

A match tells you a funder is reachable. It does not tell you whether the gift is safe to accept. Run the funder, its principals, or a prospective board member before the money is on your books.

Deep Research →

When a funder matters enough to prepare for properly — its giving history, its leadership, its other grantees, and what has been written about it — in one sourced report.

AI Operator →

The standing job behind the brief. Re-run the match on a schedule, watch named funders for new filings, and put the result in an inbox instead of a dashboard.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from a grant database subscription? +
A directory sells you what funders say about themselves plus a calendar of open calls. Civly matches on what funders actually paid: the recipient, the amount, and the purpose in their own words, out of their tax filings. The two are complementary, but only one of them tells you a foundation writes checks your size, outside its home county, to organizations it had no prior relationship with.
Where does the data come from? +
Public IRS filings, parsed from the raw electronic returns rather than scraped from a third-party summary. Private-foundation grants come from 990-PF Part XV, charity-to-charity grants from 990 Schedule I, and officers and directors from 990 Part VII and Schedule J. Federal award records and the SAM.gov grantee registry sit alongside them.
Most foundations say they do not accept unsolicited proposals. Does that make this useless? +
It makes the filings more useful, not less. A foundation that only funds a preselected circle shows it: the same recipients year after year, and a filing that names the relationship between a grantee and a foundation manager. Those rank last. What surfaces instead are funders with a demonstrated pattern of backing organizations they were not already connected to, and named trustees who can be approached properly rather than through a form.
How current is the data? +
The IRS publishes electronic returns monthly, and we take them from that release rather than waiting for an aggregator to parse them. That said, a return covers a fiscal year that has already ended, so the newest filings describe last year's giving. Grant Matching is built to answer where a funder's money reliably goes, which moves slowly, rather than what closes on Friday.
Do you write or submit the application? +
No. Civly finds the funder, proves why they match, and names the people who decide. The proposal is yours to write, and the relationship is yours to run. Where a funder publishes its own application requirements we point you at them, but we do not stand between you and the funder.
Is this only for 501(c)(3) nonprofits? +
It is built for them, but the same match runs for anyone whose funding comes from grantmakers: university and hospital foundations, museums and arts organizations, community development corporations, and advocacy organizations on the 501(c)(3) side of the house. If your money comes from foundations rather than customers, the filings work the same way.

See who is already funding work like yours

Send us your EIN. We will run the match and walk you through the funders it surfaces, the evidence behind each one, and the people worth approaching first.

Get a Grant Match