College Sports Money · Division I, no football

University of North Carolina Wilmington

Wilmington, North Carolina · Division I without football · public university. University of North Carolina Wilmington reported $26.3M of athletic revenue in 2024-25 against $26.3M of expenses. That is 1.2 times the $22.8M median for the 99 Division I programs without football, and it ranks 37th of 99 among the Division I programs without football and 221st of 358 across Division I. Revenue rose 27.5% on the prior year’s $20.6M.

Analysis by , Chief Technology Officer at Civly · All 358 Division I schools

$26.3M
athletic revenue, 2024-25
$26.3M
athletic expenses
$0
revenue less expenses
+27.5%
revenue against the prior year
37th of 99
by revenue among the Division I programs without football
221st of 358
by revenue in Division I
359
athletes · 175 men, 237 women
12,983
students enrolled

What the numbers say

Everything below is the school’s own filed figures for 2024-25, read against the 99 programs it is grouped with.

The cap against this budget

What maxing direct pay to athletes would cost

Paying the full $21.3M revenue-sharing cap for 2026-27 would take 81.0% of everything this department took in. The cap is a ceiling on what a school may pay its athletes directly, not a spending figure and not an obligation, and third-party name, image and likeness money is uncapped and does not count against it. At that share of revenue the number measures the size of the program rather than a competitive gap. Schools outside the four conferences bound by the settlement opted in to keep the option open, not because they intend to spend anywhere near the ceiling.

Who is on the rosters

Participation and enrollment as surveyed

359 athletes were counted at the school in the survey year, filling 175 men’s and 237 women’s roster spots across 10 sports. The two counts differ because an athlete who plays two sports fills a spot in both. Enrollment is 12,983. Basketball is the largest single line, $4.8M of revenue against $4.8M of expenses, which is 18% of what the department earned.

Sport by sport

What each sport brought in, what it cost, and how many athletes it carried.

SportRevenueExpensesNetMenWomen
Basketball$4.8M$4.8M+$01715
Soccer$1.6M$1.6M+$02730
Baseball$1.5M$1.5M+$0430
Tennis$814k$814k+$01210
Golf$731k$731k+$0109
Softball$727k$727k+$0028
Volleyball$675k$675k+$0018
Swimming and Diving (combined)$664k$664k+$02733
Track and Field and Cross Country (combined)$601k$601k+$03980
Beach Volleyball$217k$217k+$0014

The 10 sports at University of North Carolina Wilmington that reported money or participants in 2024-25. Sports the school surveyed but left empty are not shown. Revenue and expenses attributed to no single sport, which at most departments is the larger share of both, sit in the department totals above and not in this table, so these rows do not add to those totals. Sort by any column.

Who funds the athletes

The organization we have verified as funding this program, and what its own tax return says it raised.

Seahawk Intercollegiate

Booster foundation · EIN 874444176 · Wilmington, NC · tax year 2025, for the period ending 2025-12-31
Total revenue
$203k
Contributions
$187k
Total revenue, year before
$168k
Contributions, year before
$126k
Change in revenue
+$35k

“Operate annual intercollegiate golf tournament, the net proceeds of which will benefit the University of North Carolina Wilmington.”

The link to University of North Carolina Wilmington comes from what this organization says it exists for, in the mission statement on its own tax return, plus its registration in the same state. Names the school in its own 990 mission ('university of north carolina wilmington'); athletics wording in the name; athletics/NIL language in the 990 mission; same city (Wilmington).

What to hold against these numbers

Three things that change how the figures above should be read.

1

The survey year comes before revenue sharing started

The revenue-sharing cap is a ceiling on what a school may pay its athletes directly ($20.5M for 2025-26, $21.3M for 2026-27), not a spending figure and not an obligation. Third-party NIL is uncapped and does not count against it. No federal athletics survey covers a revenue-sharing year yet; the first lands around spring 2027.

2

What the survey is

Every college that takes federal student aid and fields a team files this survey each year under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. It is a federal filing obligation rather than a public-records request, which is why it covers private universities that the NCAA-based databases cannot reach. The figures are the school’s own reported numbers for 2024-25, not audited by the Department of Education. Reported revenue includes direct institutional support and student fees, so every department in the survey reports revenue at least matching its expenses. A surplus here is not profit.

3

What a tax return can and cannot show

A Form 990 shows what an organization raised. It never shows what any athlete was paid. No figure in the funder section is anyone’s compensation or the value of any deal. There is also no single donor-money line on the form: some organizations book donor money as contributions, others as program service revenue or fees for services, which is why total revenue leads.

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act survey, 2024-25; IRS Form 990 e-file releases for donor entities. Analysis: Civly.

Know who funds a program before you deal with it

This page is what the public record gives up for free. Civly Athletics vets the athlete, and Collective Prospecting finds and qualifies the donors behind a collective, each name traced to a filing or a public post.