Super PACs and other outside groups had reported $844 million of independent expenditures for the 2026 election through September 16, a third more than the same date in 2022. $599 million of it went to primaries that are already over. In the last midterm, 70 percent of all outside money was reported after this date.
The last thirty days alone account for $201 million, nearly a quarter of everything reported this cycle.
Six Senate races have drawn more than $28 million each. The totals include the primaries, and the two biggest, Texas and Michigan, were also the year's most expensive Senate nomination fights: Ken Paxton's defeat of John Cornyn in Texas, and Abdul El-Sayed's narrow win over Haley Stevens in Michigan on August 4.
Independent expenditures coded by which party's candidates the money helps, primary and general combined, through September 16, 2026. Texas and Michigan are both near $71 million.
Kentucky's $45.7 million is almost entirely primary spending: the May contest for the Republican nomination to succeed Mitch McConnell, which Andy Barr won. In Maine, Graham Platner won the June primary, the party replaced him with former state Senate President Troy Jackson at a July convention, and outside groups spent heavily against both of them.
Counting only expenditures designated for the general election, $245 million has been reported so far. These are the six biggest Senate battlegrounds, with the November matchups.
| Race | Helping Dems | Helping GOP | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| TexasTalarico (D) vs. Paxton (R) | $0.6M | $34.7M | $35.3M |
| MichiganEl-Sayed (D) vs. Rogers (R) | $3.8M | $27.5M | $31.3M |
| MaineJackson (D) vs. Collins (R) | $0.6M | $29.5M | $30.1M |
| North CarolinaCooper (D) vs. Whatley (R) | $0.9M | $26.2M | $27.9M |
| Ohio, specialBrown (D) vs. Husted (R) | $0.6M | $21.5M | $22.5M |
| IowaTurek (D) vs. Hinson (R) | $1.2M | $18.2M | $19.4M |
General-election independent expenditures through September 16, 2026. "Helping" a party sums spending that supports that party's candidates and spending that opposes the other party's. Iowa is an open seat. Joni Ernst is not seeking re-election. The Ohio winner serves through January 2029.
Texas has the widest gap, with $34.7 million of general-election spending helping Republicans and $0.6 million helping Democrats. Michigan has the most spending on the Democratic side, $3.8 million, against $27.5 million on the Republican side.
Both of the year's biggest House spending totals came from primaries that ended months ago. In Manhattan's 12th District, roughly $30 million in reported independent expenditures went into the June primary that Micah Lasher won. In Kentucky's 4th, $21.8 million backed the effort that unseated Representative Thomas Massie, defeated by Trump-endorsed Ed Gallrein in May. $2.8 million, in Colorado's 8th, is the largest general-election total among the eight districts in the table below.
| District | Primary | General | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York 12th | $30.1M | – | $30.1M |
| Kentucky 4th | $21.8M | – | $21.8M |
| New Hampshire 1st | $10.2M | $0.0M | $10.2M |
| Michigan 7th | $8.4M | $1.6M | $9.9M |
| Illinois 9th | $9.1M | – | $9.1M |
| New York 13th | $9.1M | $0.0M | $9.1M |
| Colorado 8th | $6.1M | $2.8M | $8.9M |
| California 40th | $6.5M | $2.0M | $8.4M |
Reported independent expenditures by district and election, through September 16, 2026. A dash means no general-election spending reported yet.
The Senate Leadership Fund alone accounts for $81.7 million, one of every ten reported dollars this cycle. The largest Democratic group, VoteVets, has reported $18.8 million, less than a quarter of that.
Bars are scaled to the Senate Leadership Fund. Through September 16, 2026.
Lean labels come from each group's publicly reported orientation. Amounts are the groups' own reported independent expenditures this cycle.
Of the $844 million, $704 million, 83 percent, went to purposes the filers describe as media and advertising. The rest is mail, polling, research, staff, and text messaging. Cycle-wide, 52 percent of the money helps Republican candidates and 41 percent helps Democrats. Seven percent could not be classified because the filing names no party for the candidate.
$192 million of the $245 million designated for the fall campaign so far was reported to oppose a candidate. In the primaries, spending to support and spending to oppose were closer to even.
Until October 14, the twentieth day before the November 3 election, outside groups report independent expenditures of $10,000 or more within 48 hours. After that date, any independent expenditure of $1,000 or more must be reported within 24 hours. In practice the filings arrive in bursts through election week. On October 15, every federal committee files its quarterly report, the fullest snapshot of the year.
In 2022, outside groups had reported $635 million by the equivalent September date, and the cycle finished at $2.1 billion. Seventy percent of the 2022 money was reported after September 16. $453 million was reported in the final three weeks. If 2026 follows the same calendar shape, this cycle would finish near $2.8 billion.
Civly loads every FEC independent-expenditure filing into its research warehouse, tied to the same donor, committee, and election records behind our research books and donor lists. These figures were computed September 17 from filings through September 16. Civly provides campaigns and parties the same computation, refreshed weekly for a specific race or state and paired with who funds each spending group.
The 2026 figures come from 10,939 itemized independent-expenditure line items filed with the FEC and loaded into Civly's research warehouse. They cover expenditures dated January 1, 2025 through September 16, 2026 and designated for primary or general elections. Superseded amendments ($65 million) and filings the FEC flags as suspect ($26.5 billion of line items) are excluded. Summing every row as filed would count amended and erroneous filings more than once and produce a total of $27.4 billion. Runoff and special-election designations outside the primary and general codes are excluded, and line items dated after September 16 are not counted.
Each line item carries the filer's own support-or-oppose code and the candidate it targets. Money helps Democrats when it supports a Democratic candidate or opposes a Republican one. Money helps Republicans when it supports a Republican candidate or opposes a Democratic one. Where the filing names no party for the candidate, the dollars are shown as unclassified, $60 million this cycle, 7 percent. Support and oppose are the filers' own designations.
Senate races are totaled by state. House races are totaled by state and district. Candidates who appear in the files under more than one FEC identifier, which happens when a candidate registers twice, are counted once at the race level. The figures here never cross a race boundary, so the duplicate identifiers do not change them.
The advertising share counts line items whose stated purpose mentions media, ads, or advertising, 83 percent of dollars. The purpose text is free-form filer input, so the advertising category is a keyword classification of the filers' own words.
The 2018 and 2022 figures apply the same filters to expenditures dated January 1 of the preceding year through the same calendar date, September 16, of the election year. The final-window counts for past cycles cover October 14, 2022 onward and October 17, 2018 onward, each the twentieth day before that year's election. Full-cycle totals for past cycles include all primary and general line items regardless of date.
Civly links every FEC filing to committees, donors, candidates, and election records, and turns them into weekly race reports for campaigns, parties, and research teams.
Civly Politics Research · prepared September 17, 2026, from filings through September 16, 2026. Sources: FEC itemized independent expenditures and 48-hour and 24-hour reporting rules. Race matchups and primary outcomes are from Ballotpedia, Bridge Michigan, and the Houston Chronicle's Texas Senate poll tracker. The 2026 ad-spend projection is AdImpact's.
All computation, filtering, and classification described under Method are Civly's. Any errors are ours. Spending totals describe reported filings and nothing about the conduct or fitness of any candidate, committee, or group named or unnamed. Not legal, compliance, or investment advice.